Wakf Board to move SC against High Court order-30/09/2010

30/09/2010

Wakf Board to move SC against High Court order

(I AM WRITING HERE AS A COUNTRYMEN,AND THESE ARE MY OWN PERSPECTIVE AND VIEWS.ITS WAKF BOARD'S RIGHT,IF THEY WANT TO FIGHT THIS CASE LEGALLY IN SUPREME COURT ALSO.NEXT DECISION WILL TAKE ONE MORE DECADE. BUT I THINK THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS INJUSTICE AGAINST ONE COMMUNITY. AND NEED OF HOUR IS TO THINK WISELY,SANELY AND RATIONALLY. AYODHYA HAS A RELIGIOUS EMOTIONAL VALUE ALSO,NO ONE CAN DENY THAT,BUT HERE IT IS A PROPERTY DISPUTE, AND WHAT BIG PURPOSE CAN BE SOLVED BY FIGHTING FOR IT? IS JUST ONE MORE MOSQUE OR A TEMPLE CAN SOLVE AYODHYAVASI'S DAILY PROBLEMS OR WE NEED TO RISE ABOVE ALL AND TOGETHER DESIGN SOMETHING(IT CAN BE IN A SHAPE OF TEMPLE AND A MOSQUE) WHICH CAN HAVE IMPACT POSITIVLY ON EVERYONE OF US AND GENERATIONS TO COME,DEFINITLY WITHIN JURIDICTION OF VERDICT GIVEN.

IS SUPREME COURT HAS SOMETHING ELSE OR ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE TO DELIVER?? I AM SURE IT WILL DELAY THIS MATTER FOR MANY MORE YEARS??? IS THIS ANY KIND OF SOLUTION?? EXCEPT IT CAN DEFINITLY FURTHER DILUTE THE ANIMOSITY AND HATRED BETWEEN THESE TWO COMMUNITIES MUCH MORE,WHICH CAN BE A BETTER POINT!! AND BELIVE ME OUR COUNTRYMEN WHO ARE VOTERS ALSO,HAVE BECOME MATURED ENOUGH TO THINK BEFORE VOTING IN ELECTIONS,AND IT WON'T VOTE ON THE BASIS OF THIS DESICION TO ANY COMMUNITY OR CANDIDATES, AS IT IS A JUDICIAL AND A COURT VERDICT.AND AYODHYA BELONGS TO EVERYONE.THEY ALL WANT PEACE AND GROWTH. SO BELIEVE IN PEACE AND TRANQUALITY,LEAD A HARMONIOUS LIFE MINUS VIOLENCE AND HATRED AS KILLINGS DID NOT TAKE A PERSON MUCH FAR!!....GOOD WISHES TO ALL OF US....VIBHA)

Lucknow: The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board on Thursday said it will move the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court order dividing the disputed land in Ayodhya among three parties.

"We will appeal against the division of disputed land among three parties," the Board's lawyer Zafaryab Jilani told reporters here. "High Court's formula of one-third land is not acceptable to the Waqf Board and it will appeal against it in the Supreme Court," he said.

He said they were not going to surrender the land. However, he said, the Board is open to any negotiated settlement on the issue if such a proposal for negotiations for a settlement came to it.

"Talks can happen if a proposal comes," he said. Jilani said the Board has time to appeal in the Supreme Court as status quo would be maintained for the next 90 days.

"The Board will move the apex court after a meeting of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. We are not in hurry as we have 90 days time to appeal as a matter of right," Jilani said.

He said personally he did not agree with the findings of the three judges. Jilani said the possibility of an amicable solution still exist provided there was a proposal to this effect.

"This proposal would be tabled before the All India Muslim Personal Law Board for consideration but we won't accept any proposal to surrender," he said.

"The judgement pronounced in the case relating to Babri Masjid is not only partly disappointing but also against the settled principles of law and evidence adduced by the Muslim side," Jilani said.

"However much cannot be said at this stage as we are yet to study the judgement in detail. Still, we are of the firm view that no public resentment is required as the matter can be taken to the Supreme Court and there is no reason for any loss of hope in favour of the Mosque," he added.

"After getting the full text of the judgement, it will be examined in detail and an appeal against the same will be prepared and filed as per the decision of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board," Jilani said adding the members of Babri Masjid Action Committee will also be consulted.

"We hope that peace and tranquillity will be maintained throughout the country and the issue will not be taken to the streets by anyone," he added.

Source: PTI