Thursday, May 26, 2011

The stigma surrounding stage actresses still persists in middle class Indian society, 147 years after the birth of Nati Binodini, the first woman icon

Women on stage still suffer bias: Amal Allana

Thu, Mar 11 2010 10:37 IST |

New Delhi, March 11

The stigma surrounding stage actresses still persists in middle class Indian society, 147 years after the birth of Nati Binodini, the first woman icon of Bengali stage, says National School of Drama (NSD) president Amal Allana.

She staged her multi-lingual play, "Nati Binodini", as part of the ongoing South Asian Women's Theatre Festival here.

"I don't think the basic mindset will change. If I went to a prostitute and brought her to play Nati Binodini on stage, people would not accept it even today," Allana, 63, told IANS in an interview.

"After all, we belong to the middle class and are still unable to digest the idea. Hence it was difficult for 19th century Bengal to accept Binodini in society. The stigma, in a way, still persists even after 147 years."

Binodini, born in one of Kolkata's red light areas in 1863, was sent to courtesan Gangabai to learn music as a child. At 12, she joined the Great National Theatre and was tutored by Girish Ghosh. Her career ended after 12 years in 1887 at the Star Theatre. She enacted 90 characters in 80 plays. Binodini wrote two accounts of her life and died in Kolkata in 1941.

Allana said Binodini felt betrayed because the "chief patron of the theatre with whom she lived refused to name it after her".

Binodini had sacrificed much and drained her personal resources for the project. "Her life was one of suffering and discrimination. She was constantly hounded by the pain that she was not part of respectable society and thoughts of death," Allana said.

"Look at the way Binodini's mentor Girish Ghosh treated her. She became the muse of his dream to build the National Theatre. But he refused to write the foreword to her autobiography because it contained controversial details about the patrons - who forced her to sell her body," Allana said pointing out the "bias against professional actresses".

"Ghosh, ironically, paid glowing tribute to her in her account of her professional life - 'My Life As An Actress'. Ghosh, on whom Binodini became dependent, left her abruptly after she played Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and was blessed by Ramakrishna Paramhans. Binodini was barred from attending Ghosh's funeral."

"Writing the autobiography 'Amar Katha' (The Story of My Life) must have been difficult for her because it is so intense. It is so hard to tell the truth. Binodini came to the stage at 12 and by 23, she was out," the NSD president said.

Allana's play looks at the life of the actress in a mood of stylised self-introspection. An old Binodini, who awaits death alone along the banks of the Ganges in Kolkata after having given up the stage - steps out of her 1913 controversial autobiography.

Binodini splits into her five alter egos - like the witches in Shakespeare's Macbeth - to analyse different aspects of her life: her aspirations to be the "moon of Kolkata's star theatre", the different characters she brought to life, her trauma of being denied a berth in the genteel women society, her sexual exploitation at the hands of her patrons - who kept professional group theatre going - and her relationship with mentor Girish Ghosh.

The tri-lingual play in Hindi, Bengali and English is operatic and somewhat larger than life.

"I have used components from Shakespeare because Shakespeare was coming to Calcutta stage for the first time in the 19th century. Girish Ghosh was influenced by Shakespeare and I wanted to keep the ethos through the music and culture of 'babus' (rich men), Binodini's patrons. Most of the 'babus' were very English in nature," Allana said.

Allana, who used a blend of Western classical music and Bengali songs for the play, said she "retained some of the original original score".

"I read 'Amar Katha' in English 15 years ago. It was a long story and lay latent in my mind. I asked Swaroopa Ghosh, a member of my cast, to translate the original into English. I am not a Bengali, but I wanted to know about her life as an actress.

"Devising and scripting the play took one and a half years. There was so much of Kalighat happening in the play. So I tried to infuse it with Krishna consciousness in the end, giving Binodini a detachment with which she could question the events in her life," Allana said.

(Madhusree Chatterjee can be contacted at madhu.c@ians.in)

Indian theatre has its roots in the Vedic times, but today it is fighting for survival and needs industry status to make it commercially viable

Industry status must for Indian theatre: Amal Allana

By Maitreyee Boruah, Bangalore, Nov 3 : Indian theatre has its roots in the Vedic times, but today it is fighting for survival and needs industry status to make it commercially viable, says acclaimed stage director Amal Allana.


"Theatre as an art form in India has its roots during the Vedic period. But in spite of such a long period of existence, theatre persons are still fighting to make theatre commercially viable," Allana, chairperson of the Delhi-based National School of Drama(NSD), told IANS in an interview here.

"Theatre cannot survive in isolation. The status of an industry will help theatre persons work in a coordinated manner for the growth and development of theatre," Allana, 61, said on the sidelines of a 10-day theatre festival at Ranga Shankara, a theatre facility in Bangalore.

The festival celebrating the Nataka Mandali or company theatre tradition began Friday with "Nati Binodini", a play directed by Allana on the struggle of the mid-19th century actress Binodini in Kolkata.

The 100-minute play in Hindi was staged by Theatre and Television Associates. The story brings into focus how Indian women in every stage of their lives have to fight a tough battle to fulfil their ambition.

"The play set in the mid-19th century is still relevant. The position of Indian women has not changed much since that time," stated Allana, who is the daughter of theatre legend Ebrahim Alkazi and has till date directed 50 acclaimed plays.

On the television and film industry being a major threat to theatre, Allana said all hurdles would be sorted out once theatre got the industry tag.

"Theatre has to be made commercially viable for its survival. Although thousands of theatre troupes are working hard and staging plays in India, they are suffering from financial penury," she rued.

"Be it Manipur, West Bengal or Karnataka, India has some of the most talented theatre troupes producing world class plays. But there is no financial backing for them. The government has to pitch in to bail out theatre from its financial bankruptcy," she added.

Lauding the support extended by several corporate houses, Allana said since its inception theatre had survived because of royal patronage. "Corporate houses coming out and helping theatre troupes in recent times is a welcome sign. Hope more such support comes our way," she said.

For instance, the Ranga Shankara theatre festival is being supported by cellular phone company Vodafone.

"Contemporary theatre is working under terrible conditions. We need to find a solution soon," Allana said.

On her stewardship of the NSD, she said "We at the NSD have various plans to bring some elementary changes in the way theatre across the country operates. Hope we achieve all our goals," said Allana, who won the Sangeet Natak Akademi award for direction in 1998.

Some of the well-known productions executed by Allana along with her husband Nissar are "Aadhe Adhure", "The Exception and the Rule", "Hayavadana", "Khamosh Adalat Jari Hai", "Birjis Qadar Ka Kunba", "Ashadh Ka Ek Din", "Mahabhoj", "King Lear", "Himmat Mai" and "Begum Barve".

In 1990, Allana received a Ford Foundation Fellowship to research the contemporary theatre movement in India.

(Maitreyee Boruah can be contacted at m.boruah@ians.in)

--IANS

Headley bought red 'bracelets' as Hindu disguise for attackers /David Coleman Headley gives details on how ISI nurtured him-27 May, 2011


Headley bought red 'bracelets' as Hindu disguise for attackers

David Coleman Headley gives details on how ISI nurtured him(so now Pakistan can not deny allegation of helping terrorism specially against India...VT)

NEW DELHI: Fresh disclosures made by David Coleman Headley during his testimony against co-accused Tahawwur Hussain Rana throw new light on the role of Pakistan's Inter-Service Intelligence handler Major Iqbal and other non-commissioned officers of ISI in training and conditioning the Pakistani-American for espionage ahead of the Mumbai terror strikes.

On the third day of the 26/11 trial underway in a Chicago court, Headley testified that after Major Iqbal was introduced to him as an ISI officer in 2006, he had received detailed training from him as well as other non-commissioned officers in the ISI in spotting and assessing people, recognising Indian military insignia and movements, dead drops and pick up points and clandestine photography.

Headley said that he was first connected to Major Iqbal through another Major Sameer Ali of the Khyber regimental center. Headley said although he had never seen Major Iqbal in military uniform, he came to meet him several times in a military jeep and his subordinates had military designations.

The decisive evidence of ISI's role in the Mumbai attacks that has come up during the Rana trial is being seen by the Indian security establishment as a vindication of their claims about the Pakistani state agencies' involvement in the 26/11 conspiracy. Underlining this, Indian ambassador to the US Meera Shankar -- who called on Union Home Minister P Chidambaram in the capital to discuss the agenda for his meeting with US Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano on Friday -- said: "The Rana trial is going on and Headley is the key witness. The revelations coming out from the trial are shedding new light on the full details of the (26/11) conspiracy."

Incidentally, MHA is hoping that Napolitano will informally share the evidence and exhibits put up before the Chicago court, when she sits across the table with Chidambaram.

The two sides will discuss issues of mutual interest, including coastal security, mega city policing, countering illicit financing and trans-national crime, cyber security, accessing and sharing of data relating to terrorism , transfer of counter-terrorism and homeland security equipment to each other, capacity building and mutual assistance in investigations including in the Mumbai terror attacks. In Chicago, Headley, despite repeated questioning by defence attorney Charles Swift, said that he did not know the full name of Major Iqbal. He however said he was sure that Major Iqbal was from the ISI.

Defense attorney Swift asked Headley, "Did ISI provide you training," to which Headley replied in the affirmative. Headley said that Major Iqbal was not satisfied with the notes taken by him during his training by the Lashker-e-Taiba. Iqbal thought the notes were "not good enough," Headley told the jury.

"So Major Iqbal had me instructed. Iqbal did some of the instruction himself and some by non-commissioned officers (NCOs), Headley said adding that he received training from Major Iqbal in a two-storey safehouse in a residential area close to the Lahore airport.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Lokpal will be a Giant Leap for Democracy-‘it will be a small first step, but it is a giant leap for Indian democracy!’-26/5/11

Rajeev Chandrasekhar is a Member of Parliament in the Upper house of Indian parliament (Rajya Sabha). Rajeev represents Karnataka state and Bangalore Urban district.

Lokpal will be a Giant Leap for Democracy

That the long slumbering Indian is waking up to the reality of what our democracy has become is becoming obvious - the chatter about the disgraceful decline of governance and Politics in our country is loud and reaching everywhere.

Hacker: Are you saying that winking at corruption is government policy?

Sir Humphrey: No, no, Minister! It could never be government policy. That is unthinkable! It’s only government practice.

This exchange between the fictional British Prime Minister and his Cabinet Secretary from the TV series ‘Yes Prime Minister’ pretty much sums up the state of governance in our country.

And, it is not funny. It’s tragic and corruption has seeped into the very nervous system of the republic, and make no mistake - every Indian attempting to lead a normal life and raise and provide for a family is paying the cost of this corruption.

The groundswell of public support for the amendments to the Lokpal Bill has clearly established that ordinary Indians want a recast of their democracy and governance.

While democracy is supposed to create a representative form of governance and a government of the people and for the people - the influence of money and other inducements combined with low participation of the educated is distorting this so called representative democracy.

Today, the voters’ mandate is easily violated by political parties purchasing majority in the Parliament and government priorities are subverted by paying for such majority. The nexus of big money from big business and politics is the real driver of this distortion. The influence of business on government and politics is almost unfettered and unchallenged because there are almost no government institutions that are capable, willing or interested in challenging this capture of Government. This is compounded by the almost complete failure to the most part of Indian media - the so called fourth pillar of the Indian democracy.

That’s why the demand for Lokpal and Lokayukta institutions is essentially a cry for a watchdog on behalf of the citizens for whom the government is supposed to exist - in the absence of any other. The Lokpal will be a super cop - not the best way to address malfeasance in government but unfortunately the only option left for us.

The campaign to have a citizen-oriented Lokpal institution has achieved an important breakthrough, but the hard yards begin now.

This is essentially a historic renegotiation of rights and obligations between the government and the citizen - a long overdue one that is critical to put India back on the path of a democracy that our founding fathers envisioned. Governments and Politicians have to be moved to a role of ‘public servants and public service’ from the current ‘ruling elite’ mindset. The Lokpal Bill will be the catalyst and prime mover for this change.

To have a credible and effective Lokpal, it is vital that the provisions of the Lokpal Bill are beyond reproach and practical.

To begin with, transparency and public participation in redrafting of the Bill is absolutely necessary. The leaders of the redrafting campaign have rightly demanded broadcast of the meetings of the redrafting committee. In the interest of transparency and for enhancing citizens’ participation in the process, the proceedings of the Lokpal committee meetings must be telecast live on Lok Sabha TV. The redrafting is going to be a tug of war between the natural reluctance of a political/bureaucratic system that thrives only in hazy non transparent world versus the increasingly strident and uncompromising demand by citizens for transparency and honesty.

To start with, the issue of suo motu investigative and prosecution powers with the Lokpal is vital. There could be threshold evidence criteria that could need to be produced before this power is exercised to prevent ad hoc use of this very important power. I have no doubt the political and bureaucratic class will kick and scream and oppose this tooth and nail and invent all kinds of excuses for it. But this suo moto power will either make or break the success of the Lokpal.

Next, Lokpal as an institution must supersede and/or subsume all existing anti-corruption institutions like CVC. Because if not, there will be classic obfuscation by forum shopping i.e., Lokpal can’t investigate it because CVC is ’seized’ of the matter or ‘CBI is investigating it’! Only the Supreme Court should be able to intervene/adjudicate on Lokpal’s decisions and findings.

Further, all bureaucrats and MPs/cabinet will be covered by the Lokpal, i.e., there will no immunity for anyone either using Parliament as a cover or Government. This is critical as well to ensure the long arm of the fight for probity reaches everyone including Prime Ministers and Chief Ministers.

The issue of appointment of Lokpal is an important one - given the powers that will vest in it and the truth about an institution only being as good as the people in it. The Lokpal institution is a representative of the people and must be legally mandated to function in the most transparent and disclosure driven manner - with use of public hearings and video and other broadcasts and transcripts to involve the people fully in its efforts. The appointment of Lokpals should be by a Supreme Court monitored committee of Indians with a track record of work against corruption and for probity in Government. The five year term is excessive and terms should be of 30 months and no more than two terms should be permitted. The second term should be allowed only under exceptional defined circumstances.

The proposed structure of 10 members and a chairperson also looks good. The proposal that they will be working in benches of three or four on each matter would add both efficiency and credibility to the functioning of Lok Pal.

However, there are some aspects of the amendments to the Bill that need to be reviewed.

The proposal to have a panel of a minimum of 4 lawyers should be improved to create a concept of a special prosecutor. Lokpal should be able to bring in outside counsel in areas of sophisticated financial crimes and graft where normal criminal or civil lawyers may not be enough.

Let’s be clear, the demand for a Lokpal bill by the Indian citizen who is waking up from his hibernation is only a first tentative step to rebuilding our democracy. But this first step needs to be taken, and to paraphrase Neil Armstrong as he stepped on the moon - ‘it will be a small first step, but it is a giant leap for Indian democracy!’

IIT-JEE results: Super-30's score: 24/30-May 25, 2011(good wishes n congratulations...VT)

IIT-JEE results: Super-30's score: 24/30










Super-30's score: 24/30
Super-30 magic: The "achievers" include Dharmapal Yadav, son of a truck driver; Abhishek Ujjwal, son of a milk vendor; Amit Kaji, son of a marginal farmer; Arjun Singh, son of a grade IV railman; Jatinder Singh, son of a ‘chaat-wallah'; Priyanka Sharma, daughter of a cellphone mechanic; Pravin Kumar Ray, son of an Army clerk; Shubham, son of a schoolteacher and fatherless Ayush Agrawal whose mother and sister eke out a living by giving tuitions in Varanasi. (PTI Photo)
PATNA: Notwithstanding attempts to scandalize Bihar's famous Super-30, the noble initiative under which 30 poor IIT aspirants are coached free of cost by state's maths wizard Anand Kumar and his team every year, shone again with 24 of the students cracking the JEE this year.

The "achievers" include Dharmapal Yadav, son of a truck driver; Abhishek Ujjwal, son of a milk vendor; Amit Kaji, son of a marginal farmer; Arjun Singh, son of a grade IV railman; Jatinder Singh, son of a 'chaat-wallah'; Priyanka Sharma, daughter of a cellphone mechanic; Pravin Kumar Ray, son of an Army clerk; Shubham, son of a schoolteacher and fatherless Ayush Agrawal whose mother and sister eke out a living by giving tuitions in Varanasi.

With this, the total number of Super-30 students in IITs goes up to 236. Set up in 2002, Super-30 is an educational initiative under which 30 meritorious students belonging to economically backward sections are selected and provided free food and lodging and coached for a year to take what is feared by many as one of the country's toughest written tests.

In 2003, 18 of the 30 students came out with flying colours while the number of successful candidates went up to 22 the next year. In 2005, 26 of the Super-30 students made it to IITs while 28 each got through the exam in 2006 and 2007. Anand and his team experienced magic moments from 2008 to 2010 with all their 30 students making it to the list of successful candidates every year.

As Anand earned fame across the globe, certain quarters accused Super-30 of faking success and dared Anand to release the list of students prior to the declaration of the results. Anand obliged his zealous and jealous critics and released the list of students along with their roll numbers to the media three days before the results were out on Wednesday. "Super-30's success is for the world to see," Anand told TOI and modestly credited the "show" to the hard work of his students.

For Dharmapal, it's like a dream come true. The 18-year-old from obscure Rashalpur village in Vaishali district had been facing fierce odds ever since his father met with an accident four years ago. "We were caught in a vicious debt trap as we spent heavily on my father's medicare. I reared a cow and sold milk and cowdung to help my family survive," said Dharmapal, who has ranked 1307 in the OBC category.

Cellphone mechanic's daughter Priyanka travelled all the way from Ludhiana to join the Super-30. "My kinsmen were apprehensive about my safety in Bihar. But it was a safe, and successful, stay," she said as she gave a chuckle of delight.

Though a tad disappointed at the failure of six students, Anand attributed it to high cut-off. "In a first in the history of IITJEE, the cut-off was 229 this year. It was only 190 last year," he said and added that all his students would have made it had the cut-off been even 216 marks.

Kalmadi sidelined OC officials who tried to blow whistle on scam-May 26, 2011

Kalmadi sidelined OC officials who tried to blow whistle on scam.

(good now people know about how people stop who try to correct system when neccessary...!!...VT)










NEW DELHI: Sacked Commonwealth Games Organizing Committee (OC) chief Suresh Kalmadi not only had a "disregard" for transparency while granting the TSR contract for CWG 2010, he had also sidelined two OC officials for opposing the "fraudulent" manner in which the contract was awarded to a Swiss firm.

The Central Bureau of Investigation, in its chargesheet, has alleged that ex-OC secretary-general Lalit Bhanot, Kalmadi's confidante and co-accused, had also overlooked the rules and conspired to favour Swiss Timing.

Surjit Lal, one of the accused, had cited that the ministry of sports had approved the eligibility criteria for the TSR bidders. However, investigations have "revealed that there was no approval of the government in respect of criteria or contents for eligibility," the chargesheet said. It also added that the sports ministry "never accorded" an approval for awarding TSR contract to Swiss Timing on a single-vendor basis.

Kalmadi also "bent" rules and "overlooked" the objections raised by two OC members — Vijay Kumar Gautam and Sujit Panigrahi — to grant the contract to the Swiss company, causing a loss of over Rs 95 crore to the exchequer. Gautam and Panigrahi are also the two key prosecution witnesses named in the chargsheet.

The central probe agency has alleged that Gautam and Panigrahi were divested of their powers, and shunted out after they opposed the tendering process. "In order to suppress continuous opposition of Gautam and Panigrahi to the conspiracy of the accused OC officials, Gautam was divested of the supervision of technology Functional Area and Suresh Kalmadi had entrusted the work to his confidant and co-conspirator V K Verma," the charge sheet said.
"At the same time Sandeep Arya, who had earlier in September 2009 been suddenly appointed consultant on the direction of Kalmadi, was appointed the ADG over Panigrahi," it said.

Vijay Kumar Gautam, COO of OC financial committee (OCFC), who was the overall supervisory officer of Technology Functional Area (FA), had opposed the "fraudulent manipulations" in the request for proposals (RFP) by Kalmadi and his associates to favour Swiss Timing. Consequently, he was subsequently relieved of all his responsibilities. Sujit Panigrahi, ADG (technology), was forced to resign in January, 2010.

Govt cracks whip on 'obscene' deo ads -(great step,it really needed such action..cheap/poverted gestures are sickening..VT)

Govt cracks whip on 'obscene' deo ads











NEW DELHI: The government has cracked down on "obscene" deodorant advertisements directing advertisers to modify them or take them off air. The I&B ministry has asked the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) to take action and submit a report within five days.

The move comes after the ministry received complaints regarding deodorant advertisements of various brands. Citing about seven instances where advertisements were found to be violating the advertising code, the ministry in its order said, "These ads appear indecent, vulgar and suggestive and hence appear to violate rule 7(8) of the Advertising Code."

The advertisements were also found violating the Cable Television Networks Rules that says, "...the cable operator shall ensure that the portrayal of the female form, in the programmes carried in his cable service, is tasteful and aesthetic, and is within the well established norms of good taste and decency."